Ethical Dilemma #3 Discussion
What is wrong with this ethical situation about D &
R paying bribery finances to Mexico contractors? The cause of doing business in
Mexico should not exceed the expectation of the U.K. regulation. White-collar
crimes are criminal acts and the wrongness of the situations is corporate doing
business can violate rules, and employees will follow this action. By Ian
authorizing action encouraging Raul to pay the additional money to speed up the
contract increased the chances of opening the stores. This spread though the
district of Mexico stores opening D & R. Raul action in reporting to his
manager is the only thing positive about the D&R case; where he cannot get
approval on the store. Corporate policies auditing the transaction is a
precaution of doing business. This violation is the ability to track back to
the management and should create a media storm on ethics violation. This is
another example of corporation being pressured in the mainstream of expectation
in doing business. Raul knew he would of been fired if he had not expedite the
opening of the stores. If found guilty the corporation can be charged with
international offence and create a fall back on shareholders. That's the
penalty of doing business international regarding bribery services, it can look
disrespectful if Raul not compliance. But the Commission of federal
guidelines of organization look at bribery as a penalty and will fine the
corporation and offensive and possible jail.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 5, 2018 6:24pm
Hi James Meyer,
I agree their are several scenarios that Raul and Ian
can go through. The fact that ethic violation has been committed by this
corporation can lead to the Commission fining the company. The corporation
guilt is what is being question and the process of getting the stores approved.
I think that it will fall back on the managerial department. Great post James.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 6, 2018 8:15pm
Hi Jessika Phillips.
We know that it's illegal to gift money in ethical
conduct to speed up the situation. It's very observant of you to question Pedro
motive in asking for money. The principle of the store manager value just
spread like corruption. Leading him to destroy documents and to collaborate on
a lie with Raul. Very touchy situation.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 7, 2018 7:30pm
hi Austin,
Thank you for the prospective view points. Raul legal
objective is acting on orders of his managerial advisory. In this case its
clearly supervisory authority over subordinate. An the criminal act of breaking
the law in D & R case is a violation and the corporation should be held
liable. The action of internal measure should be handle by the ethic committee
weather Ian and Raul should be disciplinary.
Thank you Austin.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 7, 2018 8:01pm
Hi Austin,
Excellent post! We can say that supervisor abused
employee because of the fact the job was dictated to Raul. To get the contractor
to approve the opening at the cost of bribery. Can I say Raul was naive to the
situation being U.S. College educated. Pressure was placed on employees by
managerial and decision were made in the interest of the company. Wrong
decisions but it open up a chain of stores. I keep on telling myself that the
company will be liable for the violation. An judgement will follow on what
action was taken once they found out about the ethic auditing. The norm is to
turn in all documents or if Raul follow Ian instructions then he'll incriminate
himself by destroying the records.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 10, 2018 6:56pm
Thank you Jaime,
As I recall in chapter reading that corruption in a
corporation can be dealt with though the commission dept. The federal
guidelines of organization leads corporation to train management in the
protocols of ethic violation. The reason in the subject matter we have read, if
being guilty of such a violation could be avoided then do it. Training ethical
conduct of international protocals are well aware of in this case study by Ian
and Raul. The company can incriminate Pedro for insisting Raul make a payment,
and the subject should of been brought to government channels to aid in crisis
overt. Now they have a scandal that I feel will cost the company fines for
violating U.K. international policy.
Best regards Jaime.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 10, 2018 7:27pm
Hi Jaime,
Raul environment was one of understudy and abusive
behavior. Ian management let Raul be overcome with stress of opening the store
at all cost. This is a ethical behavior I can understand to fit in D&R
organization. The value of this subject is will Raul and Ian fine the
understand of what they did wrong, because international policy have economic
protocols are in order of preventing corrupt policy. Ian damaging deposition
statement in destroying all records is as incriminating as doing the payment of
six thousand dollars to Pedro. Raul can hope of ethic training but his
surrounding in the company just got \bombarded with legalities.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 11, 2018 6:26pm
Hi Michael Bluestein,
I say the risk that the company put in to developing an
international business was just as more costly to the shareholder and
employees. To have desirable employees are the criterion for economic
partnership dealing with international business. It is a matter of educating
the employee on his countries policy as well as the other countries ideal of
ethic conduct. If one country will benefit from the merger then it's up to the
base country to fine the violation penalty.
Best regards Michael.
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 11, 2018 6:41pm
Hi Carmela,
I see temperament in this situation with management.
Ethical departments is fairly new in the corporate world and will hold people
as legal advisory and financial accountants. So being a escape goat will fall
on the company and have its repercussion on the business. Shareholder pay
dearly to avoid risk compartmental areas, this is to prevent legal troubles
down the line. In this case with Raul, his is being abused and the challenged
with legal problems because of international policy. Can he work his way out.
Only if the make advancement in the other country doesn't affect the business
corporate rules. Other than that he made the money...that should count for
something.
Best wishes,
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 11, 2018 7:01pm
Hi Carmela,
Raul did act at the request of his superior boss and
did get the go ahead to grease the palms of Pedro the contractor. The profit
will show in the future and make D&R money but the ethics of the employee
will show bad conduct and untruthfulness. This is a problem with long
term profit with finances and corporate policy. International policy was design
to prevent endangering company and employees with risk compliance. This is
about profit and drive to meet a deadline but violations does occur here and
destruction of company property just leave a paper trail. I wouldn't do it and
the cause of the company of being defame is just as important.
Best wishes
from Ethical Dilemma #3
(Discussion)
Nov 11, 2018 7:18pm
Hi Michael,
I agree that Ian did give the go ahead to doing the
wrongest possible decisions. We can see the future of the company making the
shareholder a profit which is what the motive was. The violation will happen
and the decision in destroying the intelligent propriety will come to light. We
have companies interacting with each other and evidence will turn up to
implicate D&R wrong doing. All we can say is training in ethical systems of
economics does play a part in the conduct of the international buy. And the
future of the company needs to address the community of violation that happen
in order to restore the business.
Best wishes.